
The army has justified the induction of lethal new automatic weapons, artillery, transport equipment and even attack helicopters to fight the Maoist insurgency. It says the guerrillas are using increasingly sophisticated long-range weapons and have acquired AK-47s from underground suppliers in India.
Contrary to public perception, however, it isn't just the Americans who are the main suppliers of military hardware to the Royal Nepali Army, but the Indians. Belgium, Britain and even China are the other suppliers.
The army has already replaced 5,000 of its standard issue SLR rifles with American M-16s. Another 15,000 are expected soon under the US government's $12 million military aid to fight the insurgency that also includes night vision equipment, body armour and military training. The army is keen to replace the rest of its unreliable 30-year-old SLRs.

The Indian assistance is worth some Rs 5 billion, most of which was grant aid. "They are very willing to supply the arms under the INSAS provision and we are happy receiving most of them as grants," one official told us. "Such supplies are done directly by the North Bloc without too much involvement of the Indian bureaucracy."

A similar controversy has now erupted in Britain over the supply of military equipment to Nepal. Last year, Britain bought two Mi-17 transport helicopters for the Royal Nepali Army under its 'Global Conflict Prevention Pool'.

Having acquired anti-aircraft guns from China in the late 80s, the army has recently taken delivery of Chinese-made field commnication equipment. "Of course, the anti-aircraft guns are not for firing at planes, but they are ideal in mountainous terrain," one army source said.