Nepali Times
Must See
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey 


Walking into the theatre to watch The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey had caused me some anxiety, I will admit. It is with some trepidation and real concern that I decided to see the film, the first of three, adapted from the novel by JRR Tolkien of the same name.

The anxiety I felt also had, in part, to do with the fact that I have loved the former Lord of the Rings trilogy, also directed by the very same Peter Jackson. However, while the Lord of the Rings films were based on an actual trilogy, my memories of reading The Hobbit reminded me clearly that this story, a prequel to the Rings books, was a much shorter, though thoroughly fantastic read all the same.

Hollywood has stepped in and expanded this brief but lovely tale of adventure into one of its behemoth multi-sequel moneymakers. And yet, this first film is more than good. Every element that Jackson had used in making the first three Rings films exceptionally good are also present here: the intimate knowledge of the characters and their past histories, the little details that readers love and treasure, the endearing comic, folktale-like aspects, the love of nature, the sophisticated and troubling depiction of evil, the camaraderie, the magic, and above all, the adventure that lies at the heart of all of Tolkien's beloved and long read and re-read tales.

For those who only dimly remember reading The Hobbit, this film will delight you by reminding you of all you have forgotten. For those who haven't read it, maybe now, you will? As for those who read it once a year, every year, well, perhaps you'll miss some of the things you treasured, but I think you will also find a number of other things that only an extremely well-rendered film can do, that is, to imprint onto your mind visual images that will enhance and perhaps even surpass that which your imagination had previously created in your head.

As ever with Peter Jackson, the computer imagery and the action are breathtaking. The cast welcomes back veterans such Ian McKellen as Gandalf, Cate Blanchett as Galadriel, Hugo Weaving as Elrond, and briefly, Elijah Wood as Frodo and Ian Holm as the older Bilbo.

The company of dwarves who set out to re-claim their lost dwarfdom of Erebor (which is now the domain of the dragon Smaug) are too many to name here, and there are 13 in total, but they are wonderful, each with a distinct personality. Among them is Thorin, played to austere and grand effect by the undervalued Richard Armitage, and of course, there is the young Bilbo Baggins, played by the marvelous, immediately endearing Martin Freeman.

As I watched the film with increasing hope and delight, I could only think, "But, there are two more to go, what if they ruin the other two?"

Well, they might, one never knows, but this one passes the test. I am planning to see it again soon in the theatre, to delight in the things I missed this first, anxious time, and to revisit dear Middle-earth for another few hours where for a few precious moments I can keep company with Gandalf, Bilbo, and oft forgotten characters like the animal loving, madcap, but utterly entrancing wizard - Radagast the Brown.

Watch trailer

1. a woman
liked the movie, very well made. but i was truly disappointed to see no women (except for 2 minutes of Galadriel) in the almost 3 hour long movie. i haven't read the book or the Ring's trilogy, and i know Tolkein wrote this in the 1930's (which still does not explain the complete absence of half the population) but it's just very weird and sad for me to see that we were/and still are considered such a waste of screen space and pages  I felt the same way while watching Tin Tin. 

2. Raghu

 "But, there are two more to go, what if they ruin the other two?"

There is no way that is going to happen. Both "The two towers" and "The return of the King"  were more intense and mystifying than their earlier parts.

Can't wait for "The Desolation of Smaug ", and "There and Back Again" to come out.


3. Rabi Thapa
a woman - read the book, then come back and figure whether Jackson has done justice to Tolkien's androcentric world. You can't expect him to chuck in a female dwarf if none exists in the original - or do you?

As to whether Jackson has done Tolkien justice - I'm afraid this is a horribly bloated, indulgent film that I couldn't wait to see the end of. One 3-hour movie would have done 'The Hobbit' justice - how many more dwarf dohoris, orc orchestras and gollum grumbles are we expected to sit through? Beyond ridiculous. Yes, well-rendered, but ridiculous all the same. 

That said, the trilogy will make enough gold to bring the likes of Smaug back to life, and I will probably watch it on telly, at least. But I'm fairly sure Jackson will be remembered for The Lord of the Rings, not this fool's gold.

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published)(required)

    Please read our terms of use

(11 JAN 2013 - 17 JAN 2013)