Politicians have been shedding crocodile tears, many figuratively some literally, over the demise of the Constituent Assembly. But it was they who kept the most representative elected legislature in our history as a mere rubber stamp body. And when it had outlived its usefulness to them, they abandoned it on Sunday to die quietly in the night.
The most telling, and tragic part is that many are secretly relieved that the CA was dissolved and new elections announced. The happiest were the people of far-western Nepal and the eastern Tarai who had been enduring crippling shutdowns for over a month because of identity politics. Others felt that no constitution at all was better than a fatally-flawed one. Elsewhere, the denouement at least doused the flames of inter-ethnic tensions that were spreading alarmingly on the streets.
But that reprieve came at a high cost: more than Rs 10 billion over four years, lack of focus on development and the economy, long-term damage to societal harmony and well-being from identity-laced politics. Also wasted was the progress made in the CA committees over the last four years. The next time we sit down to write a constitution, we will have to start from scratch.
The past week has also been characterised by the usual blame game. Let's face it, all sides were guilty of playing politics with the constitution and the peace process, and squandering the opportunity to chart out a just and fair constitution.
They confused the country's long-term interest with the ambitions of egotistical party leaders. They confused genuine devolution of power away from Kathmandu with a disastrously unworkable ethnic division. They engaged in ruthless brinkmanship right until the end, just so they could have the upper hand in elections in six months' time. Anyone who questioned this was immediately labelled 'status quoist Brahmin-Chhetri elite clique out to protect privilege and power'.
If Prime Minister's Bhattarai's speech on Sunday night was anything to go by, the next six months will be a struggle between those who want to strengthen democracy and those who have repeatedly and publicly stated that their end goal is to capture total state power. It will be between those who want to protect national unity and co-existence, and those who do not.
Nepalis are basically decent and peace-loving, with a high threshold for tolerance and pain. They know their rights, but expect little from the politicians. They are realistic and don't believe promises of a utopian New Nepal.
The priority now is to get this country back on its feet. The NC and UML must let go of their obstructionist objections and join a government of national unity ahead of elections. It is all uncharted territory from here on, and it may make sense to let things settle down a bit by holding parliamentary elections in November, and putting off a constitutional debate until there is more stability.
Read also:
Racing with history
Death of an institution, KANAK MANI DIXIT
The Constituent Assembly provided an example of how not to write a constitution
Conveniently left, RUBEENA MAHATO
Nepalis have moved on, but our communal communists are still dreaming of utopia
Out of the darkness, ANURAG ACHARYA
A national unity government with elections by November is the least parties can now give dejected Nepalis