"It is never too late to do the right thing, "said a passionate advocate of civil rights, in a famous movie. But is it true? Because very often when you arrive late you can not do the right thing. The most clear example is that of justice, whose excessive delay in a decision prevents to impart justice. And so we say of politics, whose delayed decisions can prevent social changes, or ensuring basic rights? The truth is that the excessive delay in a key decision, especially when it concerns human communities, can have major collateral damage to the solutions that eventually undertake. Because if something is obvious, is that, the time is a highly effective oxidizing agent.

No democratic school of thought wants the maoists to be flexible with the conservative forces like the NC and the UML(one can be anti-maoists and pro-people and in the same mode democratic but non- NC UML wallahs)All this very school expects is to see the fate of these traditional forces as 2046 movement did then with Panches. I want the fate of the NC and the UML similar to ex-panches8there is no stable remedy for the nation than this). I know I am offending the followers of these parties and "elites" like Kanak Mani Dixit whose understanding of the ground reality does not saddle with the one from the street.

Many in Kathmandu thought the Maoists were bluffing. Jha has good description of the CC debates and the conditional extension as Maoist bottomline.

Maoists proved to be smart this time, but let us wait to see whether MKN actually goes. There is no agreement on Maoist led government either and there are many others in the fray. Maoist need to introspect . one year, they tried every trick in the trade and could not dislodge this government. It is essentially the failure of Prachanda. Jha seems to be hitting him rather than Bhattarai for whom he seems to have a soft corner. Look at this 

Virtually armed Maoists and recent socio-political rejection against violent their violent modus operandi:the commencement of regeneration.

 Last month, the violence has made suffer one of its militants, The Maoists, in a confrontation with the State. But we were about to sink on abysmal depths of the very conflict; Town to Town massive rallies(anti?) and demonstrations asking to reveal the fact  If the Maoists is not just an armed organization of young people attracted to portraits of Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Marx and  Prachanda and so the violence in which they swing with romanticism, but the referent of a new socio-political movement that is being undertaken apparently just next to dilly dallying of curent pseudo-paternalist govt of old order.

revolution-ary Self-esteem

But the Maoists  has remained a significant sociological factor and constant since the abandoning of their bhumigat rajniti: the ample incorporation of active youth to their militancy, even in times that the youth movement has degenerated more. There must be added another sociological factor more significant after the instauration of the current parliamentary democracy(based on the spirit of constitution of 2046 san King): its consolidation as a huge electoral movement.

Maobadi Fetor

Over these years, the violent and arbritrary activities perpetrated by the Maoists goons have gone through several crises and even in internal cracks (like Ram Hari Shrestha and now seeing the Maoists nervousness and consequent reaction to so called reveal story by Nagariknews and Republica, sounds chor policeko khel) , the maoists have so far maintained restraints but aggressive resistance too. Yes all this in general have resulted in the grouping of the social and political movement, agreed but the topic of the maoists being violent remains intact. This socio-political character of the Maoists has allowed violence even in times as complicated as those relating to electoral and day to day social lives and has maintained a significant presence in the public sphere.

Aproximate Panorama

But that is not sufficient to reversion to a process like that of recent times, in which the regenerative premiums degenerative  and in what appears, the spaces and influences that were lost has weighed more than those won and in which the very future of the leftwing Maoists appeared more than doubtful. In a drift of this magnitude there always involves various factors and causes.. But as a solution there is one that is mainly determinant. The official abandonement of violence by the Maoists If any deal grand or package is to be done in one or two days. The violence is just a leap to vaccum which leaves the Maoists in a situation of continuity:devour the Maoists represented socio-political movement to make it walk under its shadow.. The phenomenon is not entirely new. Inside of the most organized, active and influential component of this movement, in non other than the Maoists, there has been tardyness to accept this self-destructive effect unstoppable that clear ways for the love to use the violence as a tactical mean is generating.

climate-war: wickedness versus mildness

It required the Maoists protest and peace rally to reveal that there were no space or time to violence because it would entail a social rejection which will stifle any political space for so called left-wing Maoists. And it's let the Maoists check to see whether the State have hidden intention to eliminate them like LTTE which had already put the largest party of the parliament in a corner, san contemplating that there could be a social action that would most probably censor the violence. There are still areas covered by Maoists commisars who are far from having undertaken and contemplated the situation, had oriented their so called semi-violent aka peaceful protests more like a new experience at  the time when the end of the past experience should have come into effect. But at least it seems that the awareness to that dynamic self-destructive weight is sufficient to initiate such closure i.e. the final announcement of the Maoists to abandone the arm struggle and promise the world and the society that they will do politics with tools exclusively political which include  violence.

P.S. Arthur I like your initiative to debate but i can't imagine you promising me bhautik karwaahi just because you don't agree with me or I come in the middle of your ways, will you? Further debate is welcome.

Nirmal #7, why can't you write simple and precise words instead of SAN, TROPICALITY, regenerative premiums degenerative, approximate panorama :) lol..

 "Echo" at your psyc - looked so pompous. Did you use "Thesaurus" in Microsoft Word 2010 beta version ? Or, you are in GRE preparation in Nepali Times's free web server (space) ??

You are excesively focused on vocabularies so it gives an impression that you are still learning english. Focus on the content than memorized words. Memory is not intelligent, but mere practice.

Nirmal #17, GRE is  not created for US visa, but for aptitude test to get admission into the graduate schools.

In the US civil war history, it was not the democratic votes (peaceful means) of the people that abolished the slavery system. As a matter of fact, instead, the voters of "South" favored , through the election or votes, to continue the slavery system. It was the armed force (violence) of the "North" that attacked and overpowered the Southern millitary in order to empower the black people.

The Maoists armed struggle made possible the present people-elected CA that represents all including those marginalized by the state for centuries.

Violence (war) also provides liberation of people as in the cases of above.

In order for non-violence to prevail, corrupt politicos should stop corrupting the state and people, judges should start giving justices to the people in injustice, and the state security appartus (mainly the Army) should be subordinated to a civilian goverment- no matter who runs it, left or right or middle. And, new trend in Nepal- election loosers must quit running the goverment portfolios. Then, violence goes away by itself.