KIRAN PANDAY

The association of youth gangs with politics is nothing new. In fact, such groups have survived only because of their connections to their patrons in the political parties. The parties use the groups for strong-arm tactics, especially during elections. Under the protective shield of the political parties, the groups in turn exert clout. Their activities are reflected in increasing crime rates and deteriorating security situation.

The Maoists have shed their underground identity and have entered mainstream politics, but their guerrillas are still out there in their YCL avatar. Some believe that the formation of YCL was a well-planned move of the Maoists aimed at the elections. YCL intimidation played a big role in tilting the election results in favor of the Maoists.

Now, the NC and UML have started believing in this 'gang culture' and are forming similar groups. UML's Youth Force has unleashed anarchy, especially in clashes between YCL. The police are helpless in controlling the situation because these groups have links to political bosses in government. Recently in Dhankuta, the situation between YCL and YF got so out of hand that the local administration had to impose a curfew.

Although the NC claims to be a true democratic force, it has also set up a Tarun Force to join the rat race. If the competition had been to further constructive activities, then the society could benefit. But sadly, they are competing to extort, use violence and to call strikes.

The Kosi flood destroyed lives of thousands but none of these groups were seen aiding those in need. Are strikes, shut downs and violence the only purpose for these groups?

Ramdeb Madhesi
Shantinagar, Kathmandu