Nepali Times
Critical Cinema


Director Ashutosh Gowariker keeps great interest in history but has no qualms about flouting historical accuracy. The wiles of his filmmaking were already evident in the charming Lagaan (2001), relating rural India's espousal of cricket as a patriot's wet dream. With Jodhaa Akbar, however, mired in controversy even before the release, he is finally learning the grim responsibility of historical representation.

Rajasthan was witness to protests against the film last week, claiming that Jodhaa is the wife not of Akbar but his son Jahangir. But let us not fuss - like the modern day progenies of the virile Rajputs and their VHP cohorts - about who Queen Jodhaa really was. Gowariker's researchers may not care that the misnomer comes mainly from the spurious source of the 1960 film Mughal-e-Azam, but suffice it to say that Akbar had a Hindu queen, daughter of Rajput, Raja Bharmal, who we will temporarily call Jodhaa.

Gowariker depicts this strategic marriage as an epic love story, perhaps to evoke the distant amiability of Hindus and Muslims in India. To find a 'good Muslim', acceptable to Hindus, it is as if the film had to hark back all the way to the Mughal Akbar (played by hunky Hrithik Roshan), whose good-heartedness is to be evinced by his love for Hindu Jodhaa (Aishwarya Rai). Akbar defies Islamic mores and the baddie Imams of his court to accommodate Jodhaa, even marrying her Hindu-style. The queen, who was in reality rechristened Mariam-uz-Zamani, does not even give up her name in the film. The only concession she makes to Islam is to write Akbar's name in Urdu, which neither of them can enunciate - Akbar because he is illiterate and Jodhaa because Hindu wives are not allowed to utter their husbands names.

What really went wrong for Gowariker is that, coming from an age of extreme Hindu-Muslim animosity, he was looking for drama where there was none. Akbar is an empire-builder, commander of innumerable brutal wars. But he is really a kind, liberal sort of person. Jodhaa is a fierce, assertive kind of princess, deft enough in swordplay to almost beat Akbar. She may protest being betrothed to a Muslim, but like a good Hindu girl, a champion of willful submission, she gives in without much drama. Her most outrageous demand is to be allowed to build a Krishna temple inside the Mughal palace, which is no ado for tolerant Akbar. Our main villain is Maham Anga (Ila Arun), a gross diminution of the actual figure, but even she is disposed half way through.

At the end (at which point you should congratulate yourself for having sat through), you will be left wondering how Gowariker even managed to fill the tedious length of three and half hours. The sets look opulent, but despite the monstrous budget of IRs 40 billion, the film stands as a dull imitation of the real court of Akbar. You may ask, where is Birbal and the navaratnas of Akbar's court? Where is the bustle of artists, architects and poets? Where are the courtesans and the populous harem? Where, in fact, are the numerous other wives of Akbar?
To criticise these distortions is not to sanctify history. Accurate depiction can hardly be a basis to judge a work mostly meant as fiction and entertainment. But really, having taken the artist's license, Gowariker still manages to be dull.

Director: Ashutosh Gowariker
Cast: Hrithik Roshan, Aishwarya Rai, Ila Arun, Kulbhushan Kharbanda.
2008. 200 min.

(11 JAN 2013 - 17 JAN 2013)