ALTHOUGH

 The NC has made all the right moves except making a big mistake over its choice of ministers to represent the party in the UML-led government, thus paralysing itself from day one.

 sounds somebody motivating his depressed child, Damakant's suggestion that the NC should do something beyond its existing capacity(paralyse) deserves a proper attention (as God prefers, with an approach slightly "non-mainstream"). As owing to this concrete dysfunctional performance of the NC the traditional centres of power of the Nation has been dismantled giving place to the situation clearly obsolete now. But in politics, Damakant, no one is imprescindible for long even less eternally. Not because I say this, it is because politics is like this. The politics changes so the actors though you don't see it or are not ready to see it. let's see how:

 1. There is a new central political space in Nepal. 2.Has been forged over the last three ZERO result years. 3. No one has occupied it yet. Previous statements deserve, by draft, some explanations. I�ll try to be brief and clear. Define the new political space, with the first statement which might be its greatest founding: "disenchanted but credible and clean faces of the Maoists, NC and the UML, between the Madhesi parties and Janjaati." May seem small, but it means a lot.

  Second claim: that space began to be forged from the day when CA elections took place. Most were enthusiastic about the prospects of social aspirations and this explains the non-Maoists electoral romp. Whereas, both fronts -the Maoists and non-maoists- have disappointed this authentic mainstream. Not because of this, this space is going to cease to exist, to be central and crucial.

  Up to here, in outline, the parameters of the new space. I�m on the third claim now, that this space is an orphan of any party. Neither the Maoists, the NC nor the UML may represent it without undergoing radical changes although maybe everyone of them would like to have it, and most of all, the Maoists whose desperation while making alliances is omnipresent. Because, it will not be done without changes on a scale that today, is not at their fingertips. Let's look at a detail.

  The Maoists can not, though it tried much to widen the centrality with their theme �Unite all progressist, Nationalist and Leftist�, since it can not meet the first condition. That is, for the Maoists, there is a choice of dilemma between the mother party and 21st century i.e. what polls say and what party interprets. Because what polls say is that it is far from majority, and if possible their adversary, playing the rules of the game will always make them be away from the majority. ONLY someone wanting to create confusion may argue that the space already belongs to the Maoists and they�ve also occupied it, with the vagueness of a single soul- at the same time communist and reactionary, completely contradictory double ideological line. Well, no kamred sirs, NO, you can not lead the mainstream politics. Some theorists of the Maoists, not devoid of insight, argue for the Maoists to move into that space. You can not do that without letting the childish target of old communist ideals. In the new space there could be fit everyone. Even peaceful Madhesis, not dominated by anxiety, moral and political corruption and violence (and there are, there are, although it seems complicated).

 The NC, to be the mainstream in true sense now, has to keep betting(as always) on the transformation of the country in which people are comfortable, but with a bet that it is not going to be a drill servile and compliant. Future models of both the Maoists and non Maoists are not compatible with the needs of the people and the time. One of the evils, thanks to the immobility of the NC, that it is expected to condemn the political debate polarised between communists and status-quoits. The Maoists drift toward fundamentalist communism is open and somehow unstoppable seeing the current dynamic of the party. You have to be pretty optimistic to anticipate a satisfactory stop of the Maoists political journey in any intermediate station with the shared communism. NO WAY!

If a guardian was to be found for this political space that I am talking about, it would have far reaching consequences ladies and gentlemen. Inside the country, wide consensus will be forged in self-governance. Consensus, collaboration, but also competition. Who occupies that space can be a real alternative and/or challenge to any Government. Meanwhile, the Maoists will show signs of fraustration for being alone without knowing their exact point of gravity, with lack of stimulations and incentive, tempted to the comfort of starvation. The Maoists are likely to pay a high price for it. The other consequence, in this case, would be increased youth force in future parliaments. Thus, the NC should redefine its concept of Nepal and governing Nepal if they do not want to continue installing the Maoists in power at their own faults.

Great penmanship Damakantjee, but why would NC lead the Government?

NC has failed everything historically! Remember 1990 how did Girigja or Gija dictate the country? What did he do in 2001 after the Royal Family were killed? Not even a minute of silence taken by the Parlyament? History will tell how defunct Girija was? After the India trip he was the one who sold the whole political deal to India in the famous 12 point agreements with the Maoists' in New Delhi Durbar, later his dream of becoming the first President was crushed by the Maoists'. So what to expect from the party like these people have?

If Subash Newang have any goodwll to the country he should take the country to election as soon as possible.