Most of the world's rebel forces do not talk about giving up arms in the beginning of a reconciliation process but Nepal's Maoists have done just that. This decision must be taken positively. However, the 12-point understanding between the parties and the Maoists is not a complete document in itself but a basis for additional understanding through dialogue. There remains a danger that the state might not take the understanding positively. If the government decides to treat the parties like the Maoists, as terrorists, the conflict will intensify. The situation will worsen if the state takes the 12-point pact as a threat to its own existence. But if the state considers the people's desire and prioritises peace, things might move in a positive direction. As things stand now, the state is divided on the understanding. The parties and Maoists must have considered both the would-be positive and negative responses of the government when they signed the 12-point understanding.

Any rebel force does not give up arms just like that, it requires a long process. The dialogue between the Maoists and the parties that began in Silgudi was the genesis for a deal and must be taken positively. If there is an election for a constituent assembly, it should not be held under any kind of pressure from the Maoists or government forces. Such an election can take place only if there is an understanding with the state power. If the state refuses, it won't happen. For now, the Maoists need to extend the ceasefire if they wish to implement the understanding with the parties.